<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SocialMedia - Latest Comments in Suprise, Students Don’t Use E-Mail</title><link>http://socialmedia.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://socialmedia.disqus.com/suprise_students_dont_use_e_mail/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:00:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Suprise, Students Don’t Use E-Mail</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/suprise-students-don%e2%80%99t-use-e-mail/#comment-7397942</link><description>Huh?! Where does it say that they don't use email though? (Which I thought was the entire point of this article, or are you really just that horrible of a writer/editor?)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FUnky's Fried Twinkies</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Suprise, Students Don’t Use E-Mail</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/suprise-students-don%e2%80%99t-use-e-mail/#comment-5644016</link><description>People always say that they never act based on advertisements (whether on TV, email, websites, etc.etc.). But they just don't realise how much they do, or like to kid themselves that they're not susceptible. The only way to tell whether people take notice of marketing e-mails is to send lots of them and then see what response you get back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Suprise, Students Don’t Use E-Mail</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/suprise-students-don%e2%80%99t-use-e-mail/#comment-5642065</link><description>There's a huge difference between "don't use e-mail" and "don't read marketing e-mail"...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">swag</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
