<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SocialMedia - Latest Comments in How Should We Define Social Media?</title><link>http://socialmedia.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:57:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Should We Define Social Media?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/how-should-we-define-social-media/#comment-10289329</link><description>Some people are just making some out of this world meaning and definitions regarding social media. Yours is simply the right one! Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">francisboard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Should We Define Social Media?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/how-should-we-define-social-media/#comment-4214762</link><description>What do you mean by "social visits".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Should We Define Social Media?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/how-should-we-define-social-media/#comment-4214711</link><description>Read your article with interest.  As someone knew to social media I too have been researching.  My thoughts are that Social media is self perpetuating.  We socialise via every medium  be that the old fashioned "face to face", through to social networking sites such as facebook.  The  blogs, and their comments are just another method.  The internet has enabled people to gain access to a global audience and thus establish a certain credibility through the number of social visits. &lt;a href="http://juliebest20%40word" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://juliebest20@word&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julie Best</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:35:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Should We Define Social Media?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/how-should-we-define-social-media/#comment-4209936</link><description>I consider Wikipedia and Craigslist social media. We can argue over to what degree, but "social media" is media neutral. It can be photos, text, or video. What makes it "social media" is the process applied to the content: the user generation, modification, and dissemination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm also the author of the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Should We Define Social Media?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/how-should-we-define-social-media/#comment-4202942</link><description>Seth, can the definition exclude any mention of its content? Do you want to consider Wikipedia and Craiglist to be social media?  Are mixtapes social media?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dsjoerg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:35:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>