<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SocialMedia - Latest Comments in Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://socialmedia.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://socialmedia.disqus.com/do_we_need_google8217s_behavioral_targetting_right_now/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:48:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-63657683</link><description>I hate the ads by google, i use adblocker to remove them all. It's annoying because once you click some poor person has to pay like $10 for your click</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MyHappyTel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:48:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-47047370</link><description>Every time Google announces a new feature I get nervous but interestingly our &lt;a href="http://www.realestateexpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;real estate license school&lt;/a&gt;  always seems to benefit.  There's a reason they are so popular!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">realestatedavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-41874887</link><description>The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">how to get pregnant fast</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-27291746</link><description>Considerably, the article is in reality the greatest on this noteworthy topic. I agree with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your next updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the wonderful clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Pleasant work and much success in your business dealings!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">weight loss pills</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:53:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-21664558</link><description>I posted your blog to my facebook group&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;respect&lt;br&gt;Davin saha&lt;br&gt;______________________________________________&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Computer Services Baltimore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:49:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-21661075</link><description>I subscribed to your blog when is the next post&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;sanj kapton&lt;br&gt;______________________________________________&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raleigh Painting Services</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:12:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-15722689</link><description>I have often thought that the behavioral targeting is a bit off key with what advertising should be right now.  I kind of feel like it is an invasion of privacy a bit for the end user and it seems to just be one more way we are being tracked online.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">real estate license</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:32:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-12495578</link><description>Well as we all know advertising is really important for a company to be noticed, Google is the number one most visited site, that's why many company are now using Google for their advertisements.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Real Estate Marketing</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-9359701</link><description>Goggle is surely going downhill as far their contextual advertising is concerned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">myblogisgreat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:00:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-8855013</link><description>The basis for a good ad is having the right timing and the right message. For this reason alone, google is making a smart move to target their ads. If a consumer visits a Web site that features various housing developments, it is safe to assume that this person is considering the purchase of a home. With this very small and very general piece of knowledge, Google already is able to help this consumer by placing ads such as real estate agent agencies. If the ad has the right message, Google has contributed by helping to provide the right timing. Thus, with targeted ads, everyone is benefiting from consumer to advertiser. Better ads should be a beginning standard. Targeting these ads simply accelerates their effectiveness.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LBG</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:11:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-7152630</link><description>I'm not saying that ads don't need to be targeted, just that advertisers aren't suffering from a lack of targeting. We can already target ads down to users based on gender, location, language, interests... 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;They're suffering from a lack of experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:09:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-7151693</link><description>Interesting conversation ... but I disagree with your final analogy ... It is essential that ads are tagetted, and it is essential they are better. Either way the natural economy will sift away the garbage ads. If the ads don't perform the advertisers can continue with them. This is why you said that better ads will win the day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wisdom_Stories</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
